SEL5705 - Fundamentos Físicos dos Processos de Formação de Imagens

1. BARNES, G. T. Mammography imaging physics: X-ray equipment considerations. RSNA Categorical Course in Breast Imaging 1999, p. 41-57, 1999.

2. BURKE, M. W. Image Acquisition . Chapman & Hall, Oxford , 1996.

3. CHRISTENSEN, D. A. Ultrasonic bioinstrumentation . New York : John Wiley & Sons, 1988.

4. CRUMMY, A. B.; et al . Computerized fluoroscopy: digital subtraction for intravenous angiocardiography and arteriography. Am. J. Radiol ., v. 135, p. 1131-1136, 1980.

5. CURRY III, T. S.; DOWDEY, J. E.; MURRY, R. C. The Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology . 4ed. Philadelphia : Ed. Lea & Febiger, 1990.

6. DAINTY, J.C.; SHAW, R . Image Science . 3ed. New York : Academic Press, 1976.

7. De PAREDES, E. S. Atlas of film-screen mammography , 2 nd Ed., Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins, 1992.

8. DOI, K. Field characteristics of geometric unsharpness due to X-ray tube focal spot. Med. Phys. , v.4, n.1, p.15-20, 1977.

9. FRY, F. J. Ultrasound: its applications in medicine and biology . New York : Plenum Press, 1978.

10. GOES, C. E.; SCHIABEL, H.; NUNES, F. L. S.; BEREZOWSKI, A. T. Reconstrução tridimensional de imagens obstétricas de ultra-som em computadores. XIX Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Biomédica (III Congresso Latino-Americano de Engenharia Biomédica), João Pessoa (PB) – 22-25/09/2004.

11. GONZALEZ, R. C.; WINTZ, P. Digital image processing . Addison-Wesley, 1987.

12. GRAHAM, D. T. Principles of Radiological Physics . 3.ed. New York , USA , Churchill Livingstone, 1996.

13. KARILA, K. T. K. Quality control of mammographic equipment: a 5-year follow-up. Brit. J. Radiol ., v. 61, p. 1155-1167, 1988.

14. KNOL, G. F. Radiation detection and measurement – 2 nd . Ed., New York : John Wiley & Sons, 1989.

15. LUITEN, A. L. Introduction to nuclear magnetic ressonance. Medicamundi, v. 26, p. 82-85, 1981.

16. PARKER, R. P.; SMITH, P. H. S.; TAYLOR, D. M. Basic science of nuclear medicine . London : Churchill-Livingstone, 1984.

17. PORTAIN, C. L. Nuclear magnetic ressonance and correlative imaging modalities . The Society of Nuclear Medicine, 1984.

18. RIUL, C.; VENTURA, L.; SCHIABEL, H.; SOUSA, S. J. F.; CLIQUET Jr., A. Sistema compacto de ceratometria baseado em análise computacional de imagens. XIX Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Biomédica (III Congresso Latino-Americano de Engenharia Biomédica), João Pessoa (PB) – 22-25/09/2004.

19. SÄBEL, M.; AICHINGER, H. Recent developments in breast imaging . Phys. Med. Biol ., v. 41, p. 315-368, 1996.

20. SCAFF, L.A. M. Bases físicas da radiologia - diagnóstico e terapia . São Paulo : Ed. Sarvier, 1979.

21. SCHIABEL, H.; MARTINEZ , A. C.; VIEIRA, M. A. C.; ESCARPINATI, M. C. – Evaluating the influence of image acquisition system quality on a mammographic images processing scheme. SCAR Annual Meeting 2005 , Orlando, FL (USA) – June, 2-5, 2005.

22. TANNUS, A. Desenvolvimento da tecnologia de tomografia por ressonância magnética nuclear - TORM . Tese de Doutorado, IFQSC/USP, São Carlos, 1987.

23. VENTURA, L.; CHIARADIA, C.; SOUZA, S. J. F.; CASTRO, J. C. Novo método de medidas objetivas de erros refrativos oculares. Rev. Bras. Ens. Fís. , v. 9, p.147-151, 1994.

24. VENTURA, L.; CASTRO, J. C. Ametropias oculares. Rev. Bras. Ens. Fís ., v. 17, p. 305-316, 1995.

25. VERGNAGHI, D.; MONTI, A.; SETTI, E.; MUSUMECI, R. A use of a neural network to evaluate contrast enhancement curves in breast magnetic resonance images. Journal Dig. Imaging , v. 14, n. 2, sup. 1, p. 58-59, 2001.

26. WEBER, M. J. Handbook of laser science and technology . New York : CRC Press, 1982.

27. WELLS, P. N. T. Choices in medicine: illustrations from imaging. J. Med. Eng. & Technol ., v. 14, p. 225-232, 1990.

28. WILKS, R. J. Principle of radiological physics . 2ed. New York : Churchill-Livingstone, 1987.

29. ZANAMARI, F.V. An evaluation of the accuracy of flow measurements using magnetic imaging (MRI). J. Med. Eng & Technol ., v. 15, p. 170-176, 1991.

SEL5708 - Avaliação da Qualidade de Imagens Médicas

1.CHAN, H. P.; NIKLADSON, L. T.; IKEDA, D. M.; LAM, K. L.; ADLER, D. D. Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. Med. Phys ., v. 21, p. 1203-1211, 1994.

2. COSTA, P. R.; CALDAS, L. V. E. – Evaluation of protective shielding thickness for diagnostic radiology rooms: theory and computer simulation. Med. Phys ., v. 29, n. 1, p. 73-85, 2002.

3. EVANS, A.L. The evaluation of medical images . Bristol : Adam Hilger, 1981.

4. DAINTY, J.C.; SHAW, R. Image Science . 3ed. New York : Academic Press, 1976.

5. DOI, K. Field characteristics of geometric unsharpness due to the X-ray tube focal spot. Med. Phys ., v. 4, p. 15-20, 1977.

6. DOI, K., et al . MTF's and Wiener spectra of radiographic screen-Film systems - Part I: interlaboratory comparison of measurements. HHS Publication FDA 82-8187, p. 6-38, 1982.

7. DOI, K.; GIGER, M. L.; NISHIKAWA, R. M.; SCHMIDT, R. A. Digital Mammography . Elsevier, The Netherlands , 1996.

8. ESCARPINATI, M. C.; VIEIRA, M. A. C.; SCHIABEL, H. Computer technique for digital radiographic images correction based on the digitizer characteristic curve. Journal Dig. Imaging , v. 15, suppl. 1, p. 228-230, 2002.

9. ESCARPINATI, M. C.; VIEIRA, M. A. C.; SCHIABEL, H. Evaluation of film digitizer's spatial resolution by slit image computational analysis. SPIE MI2004: Physics of Medical Imaging , v. 5368, p. 861-868, 2004.

10. ESCARPINATI, M. C.; SCHIABEL, H.; VIEIRA, M. A. C. – Quality assurance procedures for radiographic film digitizer by digital image computational analysis Proc. SCAR Annual Meeting 2005 , Orlando , FL ( USA ) – June, 2-5, 2005. |

11. FUJITA, H.; et al . A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography ,. IEEE Trans. on Med. Im ., v. 11, p. 34-39, 1992.

12. GIGER, M. L.; DOI, K. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. I - Modulation transfer function. Med. Phys ., v. 11, p. 287-295, 1984.

13. GONZALEZ, R. C.; WINTZ, P. Digital image processing . Addison-Wesley, 1987.

14. GREER, P. B.; VAN DOORN, T. Evaluation of an algorithm for the assessment of the MTF using an edge method”, Med. Phys ., v. 27, p. 2048-2059, 2000.

15. KANAMORI, H.; MATSUMOTO, M. The information spectrum as a measure of radiographic image quality and system performance. Phys. Med. Biol ., v. 29, p. 303-313, 1984.

16. KONONENKO, I. Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. v. 23, p. 89-109, 2001.

17. NELSON, R. E.; STEARS, J. G.; BARNES, G. T.; GRAY, J. E. Acceptance testing of radiologic systems: experience in testing 129 imaging systems at two major medical facilities. Radiology , v. 183, p. 563-567, 1992.

18. NISHIKAWA, R. M.; YARUSSO, L. M. Variations in measured performance of CAD schemes due to database composition and scoring protocol. SPIE MI1998: Image Processing , v. 3338, p. 840-844, 1998.

19. ROSSMANN, K. Point spread function, line spread function and modulation transfer function. Radiology , v. 93, p. 257-272, 1969.

20. RUBIRA-BULLEN, I. R. F.; ESCARPINATI, M. C.; SCHIABEL, H.; VIEIRA, M. A. C.; RUBIRA, C. M. F. Comparação do desempenho de diferentes dispositivos de digitalização de filmes radiográficos odontológicos. II Workshop Regional de Engenharia Biomédica e I Simpósio Regional de Instrumentação e Imagens Médicas , p. 30 – São Pedro (SP), 29-31/10/2003.

21. SCHIABEL, H.; FRÈRE, A. F.; MARQUES, P. M. A. The need for investigating the optical transfer functions in several field orientations for nonisotropic radiographic systems. Med. Phys ., v. 20, p. 999-1005, 1993.

22. SCHIABEL, H.; FRÈRE, A. F.; MARQUES, P. M. A. The modulation transfer function - a simplified procedure for computer-aided quality evaluation in mammography. IEEE Eng. Med Biol ., v. 16, p. 93-101, 1997.

23. SCHIABEL, H. - Modulation transfer function for quality assurance of mammographic systems: a “quality relative index” for expressing radiographic system quality. IEEE – Eng. Med. Biol ., v. 19, n. 4, p. 96-110, 2000.

24. SCHIABEL, H.; NUNES, F. L. S.; ESCARPINATI, M. C.; BENATTI, R. H. Investigations on the effect of different characteristics of images sets on the performance of a processing scheme for microcalcifications detection in digital mammograms. Journal Dig. Imaging , v. 14, n. 2, suppl. 1, p. 224-225, 2001.

25. SCHIABEL, H.; MARTINEZ, A. C.; VIEIRA, M. A. C.; ESCARPINATI, M. C. Evaluating the influence of image acquisition system quality on a mammographic images processing scheme. Proc. SCAR Annual Meeting 2005 , Orlando , FL ( USA ) – June, 2-5, 2005.

26. SILVA, K. C.; SCHIABEL, H.; NUNES, F. L. S. - Image processing techniques for asymmetry detection in mammographic images. In: Proc. SCAR Annual Meeting 2004 , p. 126-127 – Vancouver ( CANADA ) – May, 20-23, 2004.

27. VIEIRA, M. A. C.; SCHIABEL, H.; ESCARPINATI, M. C. Using of a film scanner as a microdensitometer for optical transfer function and focal spot measurements - SPIE MI03: Physics of Medical Imaging , v. 5030, p. 1061-1068, 2003.

28. VIEIRA, M. A. C.; SCHIABEL, H.; ESCARPINATI, M. C.; GOES, C. E. – Realce de imagens mamográficas no domínio da freqüência util izando filtro de Wiener. XIX Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Biomédica (III Congresso Latino-Americano de Engenharia Biomédica) – João Pessoa (PB) – 22-25/09/2004.

29. WELLS, P. N. T. Choices in medicine: illustrations from imaging. J. Med. Eng. & Technol ., v. 14, p. 225-232, 1990